قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / Lena Dunham’s master class in how to not defend a friend accused of sexual assault

Lena Dunham’s master class in how to not defend a friend accused of sexual assault



Y again, writer, actress and sad professional girl Lena Dunham found herself in hot water. This time, it is because of his response – even in this case – to an accusation of sexual assault against one of his ex-writers, Murray Miller. For anyone looking for a response to a friend in post-MeToo, you're exactly the opposite of what Dunham did.

At the end of last year, just after the monstrosity of Harvey Weinstein, the actress Aurora Perrineau presented a police report against Miller, who had worked on the Dunham show "Girls", accusing him of having her raped when she was 1

7, below the age of consent in the state of California.

At that time, Dunney and the "Girls" showrunner Jenni Konner, with whom Dunham fell, wrote a statement stating that because of "knowledge of privileged information," they were "confident" that he was accused of Perrineau belonged to the minority of rape charges "that are erroneously declared each year". In other words, Dunham and Konner have accused Perrineau of lying openly to the police.

The case of Perrineau was not well reported, and due to the expiration of the landmarks statute, the Los Angeles County District Attorney refused to file a complaint against Miller. Without any real detail of the case, including if there are any other confirmatory witnesses or not, it is impossible for the public to say with certainty whether or not the lie of Perrineau. Unless, of course, Dunham and Konner want to exonerate their friend by revealing the "knowledge of privileged information" they claimed to have, right?

Apparently, Dunham was lying between his teeth while she held out his neck to a man who evidently had no reason to defend. In an apologetic public excuse to Perrineau, Dunham wrote: "I did not have the" privileged information "I was supporting, but rather the blind trust in a story that kept slipping and changing and revealed that it meant nothing."

Do you mean that Dunham has climbed over the skis to defend one of the tribes at the expense of another woman? Hit me shocked.

The biggest problem here could be the inclination of Dunham to fit needlessly into polemics after controversy. But his return here serves as a good tutorial on how not to respond to accusations against a friend.

For an obvious thing, do not lie. But more importantly, consider what information you are actually aware of. If Dunham came out with a statement that said something like: "In the many years I've worked and I've been a friend of Murray Miller, I've never witnessed any level of disrespect for women, and the charges against he is inconsistent with everything I know about him, "no one would have criticized. A friend can attest to the character of the accused without stating that the accuser lying and falsely claiming a total knowledge of someone's behavior. While many of the sexual predators chiseled in the last year, such as Les Moonves and Matt Lauer, were open secrets and difficult to ignore in the industry, many have certainly maintained their public reputation, presumably even among friends. and family.

For all his faults, Dunham deserves the merit of apologizing with a sincere admission of both stupidity and dishonesty. If his mistakes are to remember that the accused friends should attest to what they know, not what they want to be true, then his apologies will have helped not only Perrineau, but also the public.


Source link